Science Tidbits #4
Moderator: RJDiogenes
- RJDiogenes
- Olympian
- Posts: 82419
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:24 am
- Location: Boston
- Contact:
Re: Science Tidbits #4
Looks like they're finally getting some real-time data (or at least as real time as it gets in a relativistic universe) on Tabby's Star. Maybe they've finally be able to figure out what's going on with those aliens up there.
Re: Science Tidbits #4
750 day period is interesting, though as he points out (object or cloud) it would have to be huge to block out the star. Aliens are still being dismissed, though mostly due to the lack of radio transmissions. Personally I think any advanced species would find something better than EM to communicate over distances. Of course that brings us to the paradox that any civilization advanced enough to make a Dyson sphere is too advanced to need a Dyson sphere. Still a natural explanation is probably the correct one.
Whatever it is.
Whatever it is.
- RJDiogenes
- Olympian
- Posts: 82419
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:24 am
- Location: Boston
- Contact:
Re: Science Tidbits #4
Yeah, it's going to be mighty weird, whatever it is.
And just because aliens don't need a Dyson Sphere, doesn't mean they don't want a Dyson Sphere.
And just because aliens don't need a Dyson Sphere, doesn't mean they don't want a Dyson Sphere.
Re: Science Tidbits #4
Alien Trump: "We're going to build that sphere and the Romulans are going to pay for it!"
- RJDiogenes
- Olympian
- Posts: 82419
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:24 am
- Location: Boston
- Contact:
Re: Science Tidbits #4
There's the answer to the Fermi Paradox. Alien Trump has walled them all in.
Re: Science Tidbits #4
An interesting article about possible modern humans as old as 300,000 years!
First off this would be consistent with the relatively rapid human dispersion across the globe and I have been leaning more towards a Levantine or Mediterranean origin for modern humans. Secondly these remains are better preserved than many of the specimens from southern Africa- a lot of which I think are a little dodgy.
However, while the skull is impressive I'm not sure I'd go for it being a modern human and I do have to wonder about the dating as it is eerily similar to the specimens from the much younger Skhul site. These specimens have also been described as either modern or Neanderthal depending on what's in vogue at the time.
First off this would be consistent with the relatively rapid human dispersion across the globe and I have been leaning more towards a Levantine or Mediterranean origin for modern humans. Secondly these remains are better preserved than many of the specimens from southern Africa- a lot of which I think are a little dodgy.
However, while the skull is impressive I'm not sure I'd go for it being a modern human and I do have to wonder about the dating as it is eerily similar to the specimens from the much younger Skhul site. These specimens have also been described as either modern or Neanderthal depending on what's in vogue at the time.
- RJDiogenes
- Olympian
- Posts: 82419
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:24 am
- Location: Boston
- Contact:
Re: Science Tidbits #4
Evidence does seem to be accumulating for an earlier origin, but I think we need a lot more. Are they able to extract DNA from these fossils? It doesn't seem like they've ruled out convergent evolution for the similarities in facial structure.
Re: Science Tidbits #4
I haven't heard of any DNA recovery yet. Most specimens where DNA has been recovered have been in the 30,000 to 50,000 year range.
Re: Science Tidbits #4
I am very sceptical. According to that article the dating is based only on the found flints. The material itself may easily be 300 000 years old, however, that doesn't say anything about when it was turned into tools.
Radio-carbon dating the bones is not very reliable either as this method has a pretty wide error margin. Datings that were out by 100 000 years are not unheard of (just remember the case of the "Hobbit" they discovered a few years ago).
The surest method would indubitably be a DNA-Analysis but for that we'd require at least one undamaged and un-fossilized molar of an adult.
Reconstructing one skull from fragments of several individuals is highly risky aslong as you aren't 100% certain that these belonged to the same time frame. Habitable sites were rare in those days and often inhabited by different groups for several milennia. The skull-reconstruction looks way too modern in my opinion. I very strongly doubt that it's so much older than the Ethiopian finds, for example Lucy. It looks more Cro Magnon I'd say.
Radio-carbon dating the bones is not very reliable either as this method has a pretty wide error margin. Datings that were out by 100 000 years are not unheard of (just remember the case of the "Hobbit" they discovered a few years ago).
The surest method would indubitably be a DNA-Analysis but for that we'd require at least one undamaged and un-fossilized molar of an adult.
Reconstructing one skull from fragments of several individuals is highly risky aslong as you aren't 100% certain that these belonged to the same time frame. Habitable sites were rare in those days and often inhabited by different groups for several milennia. The skull-reconstruction looks way too modern in my opinion. I very strongly doubt that it's so much older than the Ethiopian finds, for example Lucy. It looks more Cro Magnon I'd say.
a hug a day keeps the psychiatrist away
Re: Science Tidbits #4
You really can't carbon date anything much older than 40,000 years old. After that you have to rely on different methods.huggle wrote:Radio-carbon dating the bones is not very reliable either as this method has a pretty wide error margin. Datings that were out by 100 000 years are not unheard of (just remember the case of the "Hobbit" they discovered a few years ago).
Lucy was a Australopithecus afarensis and is substantially older than these finds (3 to 4 million year bp). What they think they found here are the oldest modern humans- much older than Cro Magnon. Still as I pointed out they do strongly resemble specimens from sites like Qahzeh or Skhul which tend to run around the 90,000 to 80,000 year mark.The skull-reconstruction looks way too modern in my opinion. I very strongly doubt that it's so much older than the Ethiopian finds, for example Lucy. It looks more Cro Magnon I'd say.
- RJDiogenes
- Olympian
- Posts: 82419
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:24 am
- Location: Boston
- Contact:
Re: Science Tidbits #4
It's too bad these folks didn't carry drivers' licenses or something.
Re: Science Tidbits #4
Well, of course they didn't. You don't need a license for a foot-powered Flintstonemobile for the same reason you don't need a license for a horse: they have a safe brain:horsepower ratio.
Of course the brainpower of cars is coming up fast; you soon won't need a license for autonomous cars, either
Of course the brainpower of cars is coming up fast; you soon won't need a license for autonomous cars, either
- RJDiogenes
- Olympian
- Posts: 82419
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:24 am
- Location: Boston
- Contact:
Re: Science Tidbits #4
I look forward to that. "Take me to the Blue Hills. Wake me when we get there."
Of course, there will then be the inevitable, "Sorry, I can't come over. My car has the night off."
Of course, there will then be the inevitable, "Sorry, I can't come over. My car has the night off."
Re: Science Tidbits #4
More Planets from Kepler!
- RJDiogenes
- Olympian
- Posts: 82419
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:24 am
- Location: Boston
- Contact:
Re: Science Tidbits #4
4000 planets, 2000 confirmed, 50 Class-M planets, 30 of those confirmed-- all from a patch of sky in Cygnus. There's a whole lotta planets out there.
This KOI 7711 sounds very promising. I wonder what type of star it has.
This KOI 7711 sounds very promising. I wonder what type of star it has.